Faith, Beer, and Other Things That Interest Geoff

I am confused about how you can claim to refute the Catholic teaching of Papal infallibility if you don't know if Unam Sanctum was declared infallible? Don't you think you should know that before making such a claim? Different issue: early Christians were accused of being cannibals because of their view of the Eucharist. However, you believe Jesus was being figurative with his speech. Since early Christians lived shortly after Christ lived, do you think it is unreasonable to think that they might have more insight to the matter than someone living much later? Just some thoughts...