Friday, July 23, 2004
What If Marbury vs. Madison is Crap?
The House voted to restrict the judiciary from being able to decide gay marriage questions between states. God bless them.
The interesting thing in the article is the constitutional questions. Some actually believe that this is unconstitutional because of judicial review. Even though Congress has the right in the Constitution, explicitly stated.
I find it scary that some (some who were opposed realize this is a bad argument) Congressmen are unaware of this Constitutional provision.
Btw, if I were president, I would sign a executive order declaring Marbury vs. Madison as having no basis in the Constitution. That would be a fun day.
The House voted to restrict the judiciary from being able to decide gay marriage questions between states. God bless them.
The interesting thing in the article is the constitutional questions. Some actually believe that this is unconstitutional because of judicial review. Even though Congress has the right in the Constitution, explicitly stated.
I find it scary that some (some who were opposed realize this is a bad argument) Congressmen are unaware of this Constitutional provision.
Btw, if I were president, I would sign a executive order declaring Marbury vs. Madison as having no basis in the Constitution. That would be a fun day.
